ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00007434
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Asset Management Associate | Asset Management Company |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Industrial Relations Acts | CA-00010075-001 | 06/03/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00010075-002 | 06/03/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 06/07/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Rosaleen Glackin
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Preliminary Issue – Correct Name of the Respondent.
Both Parties confirmed at the Hearing that the correct name of the Respondent is the Respondent Company named in the complaints referred to the Workplace Relations Commission on 6th March 2017 under ADJ 7431. I have issued a Decision in relation to the complaints under ADJ 7431.
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
In accordance with Section 41(5) of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015, I declare I do not have jurisdiction to hear this complaint as the Complainant has named the incorrect Respondent in this complaint. However identical complaints were lodged with the WRC on the same date under ADJ 7431, naming the correct Respondent, which were heard on 6th July 2017 and a Decision has issued.
Dated: 23/08/17
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Rosaleen Glackin
Key Words:
No jurisdiction as incorrect Respondent named. |